Non uniform sediment deposition dating introduction dating service
And they're satisfied with that because they already have an easily-accessible and stable food source that is not going to kill them.Since it is easy to fish and hunt with sticks and stones, they'd have more time for leisure, entertainment, music, arts, etc.If you read the linked papers you would find that the claims come from mainstream peer-reviewed research; we did not make this up.You would also have seen that with the main paper cited about oil, simulating assumed natural conditions, it took to produce oil, which would hardly be an economically viable way of producing oil to sell.The only comment that remotely resembles your first complaint is a response to a fact-free rant by a Paul C., from the USA, where Paul C.made unsupported charges about the article being "an insult to real science".Furthermore, with the experiment you claim he cites that shows a "sample millions of years old was extracted successfully", while acknowledging the authors' care in doing the experiment, consistent with his scepticism over DNA being extracted from fossils millions of years old Lindahl casts doubt on their findings (p. Lindahl says that the DNA not rejected as contamination, was "somewhat arbitrarily assigned as being representative of the [termite] fossil". Lindahl: "It will now be important to assess the reproducibility of such findings." He then goes on to criticize another claim of DNA found in a magnolia leaf said to be 20 million years old.
Evidence of very recent or even present formation of oil is consistent with a young earth.
However, it boils down to how they are motivated to do so.
10,000 years before, humans lived by either (a) fishing, or (b) hunting.
The economic viability of producing coal and oil depends on many things and is quite irrelevant to the matter of experiments that have shown how quickly coal and oil can form (it does not need millions of years). However, there is one thing that I want to argue with you: the origin of agriculture.
"Secular dating puts it at about 10,000 years and yet that same chronology says that modern man has supposedly been around for at least 200,000 years.But just would be qualified to write such an article?Because of this, various specialists in different fields were asked to check areas where they had expertise.Furthermore, in most cases I am citing work by specialists in their fields.